Gauff defeats Pegula to set up semifinal against Muchova, who overcame four-time Grand Slam champion Osaka.
Holders Argentina survive huge scare to earn a 3-2 win over Egypt and reach the World Cup quarterfinals.
No decision yet on whether Russia may display its flag, colours or have its anthem played at the Games.
Egypt score a goal and then save a Messi penalty to keep the reigning champions at bay in Atlanta.
Teams shaped by migration and diaspora are challenging exclusionary ideas of who belongs.
Footballers of African descent are often subjected to racist abuse on and off the pitch.
Latest match highlights, reaction and previews from the FIFA World Cup 2026 in North America.
Argentina continue their knockout journey against Egypt as Switzerland and Colombia also fight for progression.
Colombia, the World Cup’s dangerous outsiders, take on Switzerland in Vancouver for a place in the quarterfinals.
![HEADLINE What is NATO article 5? COPY Article 5 of the NATO treaty states the principle of collective defence as being at the core of NATO’s initial pact. This clause means that an attack against one ally is considered an attack against all members. NATO’s military operations started with a naval blockade and air campaign during the Bosnian war in the 1990s. In 1999, NATO launched an air campaign to compel Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic to pull his forces out of Kosovo and end the conflict there. Following the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US, NATO invoked Article 5 and members joined US and UK forces to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan. Over the 20-year war, 50 NATO and partner nations contributed forces to the missions in Afghanistan. At its peak in 2011, nearly 140,000 US and allied forces were in the country.Show moreRefined headline formatting and tightened prose throughoutRefined headline formatting and tightened prose throughoutHEADLINE: What is NATO's Article 5? COPY: Article 5 of the NATO treaty states the principle of collective defence is at the core of NATO's founding pact. This clause means that an attack against one ally is considered an attack against all members. NATO's military operations started with a naval blockade and air campaign during the Bosnian war in the 1990s. In 1999, NATO launched an air campaign to compel Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic to pull his forces out of Kosovo and end the conflict there. Following the September 11, 2001**,** attacks on the US, NATO invoked Article 5 and members joined US and UK forces to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan. Over the 20-year war, 50 NATO and partner nations contributed forces to the missions in Afghanistan. At its peak in 2011, nearly 140,000 US and allied forces were in the country. Edits: headline capitalises Article 5 to match the body (it is a formal treaty provision, and the body already treats it as one); "as being at the core" trimmed to "is at the core" - filler; "initial pact" to "founding pact" since "initial" implies a later pact replaced it; Milosevic's title corrected - in 1999 he was president of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, not "Serbian leader" (he had left the Serbian presidency in 1997), and "Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic" is the standard AJE formulation for the Kosovo campaign; comma after the year in the full-date construction per the guide. Flags: "the NATO treaty" - its name is the North Atlantic Treaty (or Washington Treaty); "Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty" is the precise first mention if the desk wants it, though "the NATO treaty" is defensible shorthand in an explainer. Worth one added clause if the desk allows: the 9/11 invocation is the only time Article 5 has ever been triggered - that is the single most-cited fact about it and its absence from an Article 5 explainer is conspicuous. Adding "for the first and only time" after "invoked Article 5" would need no new sourcing; it is standing NATO record. Your call since it adds content rather than corrects it. The Afghanistan numbers (50 contributing nations, ~140,000 peak in 2011) match NATO's own ISAF figures - no change, just confirming they check out. HEADLINE Why is NATO meeting in Turkiye? COPY NATO summit meetings are held in one of the member countries. Members can volunteer to host a summit meeting and the North Atlantic Council (NAC) – NATO’s principal political decision-making body – makes the final decision concerning the location. The 2026 Ankara Summit is the second NATO summit hosted by Turkiye. In 2004, a summit was hosted in Istanbul.HEADLINE: Why is NATO meeting in Turkiye? COPY: NATO summits are held in one of the member countries. Members can volunteer to host a summit and the North Atlantic Council (NAC) - NATO's principal political decision-making body - makes the final decision on the location. The 2026 Ankara summit is the second NATO summit hosted by Turkiye. In 2004, Turkiye hosted a summit in Istanbul. Edits: "summit meetings"/"summit meeting" is a tautology - a summit is a meeting, and the guide's tautology rule applies; "concerning" to "on" per the short-word rule; "Ankara Summit" lowercased - AJE capitalises proper names but treats "the Ankara summit" as descriptive, consistent with how the excerpt post earlier ran "the summit"; the final one-line paragraph folded into paragraph two - a three-word-shy sentence dangling as its own paragraph read like a lost bullet, and the merge also fixes the passive "a summit was hosted", which left Turkiye out of its own sentence. Flag: the dashes here are unspaced em-style in the original ("body – makes") - they carry through as en dashes with spaces per the templating rule (spaced en dash only), which my version shows. If the CMS auto-converts, no action; if not, worth the glance since this is the first update today with dash-set parentheticals. Verified in passing: Istanbul 2004 was indeed Turkiye's only previous NATO summit, so "second" checks out, and NAC as the deciding body is correct per NATO's own summit guide.The World Cup has reached its decisive stage, with every match carrying the weight of history. Argentina continue their mission to defend their world title against Egypt in Atlanta as Switzerland and Colombia also fight for progression to the quarterfinals, while the tournament continues to deliverpastedHEADLINE FIFA World Cup: Argentina vs Egypt, Ronaldo exit and Mbappe condemns racism REPLACEMENT HEADLINE World Cup Round of 16: Argentina face Egypt as Ronaldo bids farewell SUMMARY Argentina continue their knockout journey against Egypt as Switzerland and Colombia also fight for progression. COPYAudited sports roundup for scheduling conflicts, formatting inconsistencies, and editorial standardsAudited sports roundup for scheduling conflicts, formatting inconsistencies, and editorial standardsHEADLINE: FIFA World Cup: Argentina vs Egypt, Ronaldo exit and Mbappe condemns racism REPLACEMENT HEADLINE: World Cup round of 16: Argentina face Egypt as Ronaldo bids farewell SUMMARY: Argentina continue their knockout journey against Egypt as Switzerland and Colombia also fight for progression. COPY: [unchanged through the intro] What is Tuesday's schedule? Argentina vs Egypt: Tuesday, Atlanta Stadium, noon local (16:00 GMT) Switzerland vs Colombia: Tuesday, BC Place**,** Vancouver, 1pm local (20:00 GMT) [predictions sections unchanged - and both sets of Opta percentages sum correctly, 99.9 and 100.0, so the numbers are internally sound] Egypt section: He went on to say the global response to civilian suffering in Gaza was comparable with the reaction to animal welfare... Hassan's comments came as Egypt prepare for the biggest match in the nation's football history... Mbappe section: ...after she made racist remarks following Paraguay's World Cup round-of-16 defeat to France... Paraguayan Senator Celeste Amarilla... [translation block] ...that country which has sweated passion and honour throughout the competition... Edits: the crosshead said Wednesday but both matches are Tuesday - the day error is the one that would have embarrassed; local times restored alongside GMT per the guide and your earlier explainer ("noon (16:00 GMT)"); "compare... as comparable with" was a double comparison that parsed as nothing; "Egypt prepares" to "prepare" - every other team in the piece takes the plural sports verb (Argentina continue, Switzerland have, the United States were), so Egypt joins them; "round of-16" hyphen repaired; Senator capitalised directly before her name per the titles rule; the translation block's "honor" Britishised to match the body quote - the translation is our rendering of his French, so it takes house spelling; replacement headline's "Round of 16" lowercased. Flags: The translation block has no embed above it - "Translation:" floats with nothing to translate. The X embed of Mbappe's post presumably goes there; make sure it survives templating. Reproducing Amarilla's slurs - the piece quotes her tirade at length ("colonised Cameroonian... brute"). Documenting the racism Mbappe answered is a legitimate editorial choice AJE does make, but it is a desk call, not a copyedit call - confirm the sports desk wants the quotes at this length rather than characterised. Both headlines over the cap (75 and 68). If enforced: "World Cup: Argentina face Egypt, Ronaldo exits, Mbappe hits back" is 64. "the United States' World Cup exit" - the guide's letter actually prescribes "United States's" (its own example: "the United States's wealth"). Site usage generally runs s-apostrophe, so I have not changed it - but it is a genuine guide-versus-practice split; your call or Tamila's. Zero-width characters in the Amarilla paragraph ("Amarilla wrote", "slapped him after") - flatten. "FIFA controversially lifted his red-card suspension" - "controversially" is a voice adverb, though AJE's own match report framed it as a "reprieve", so it has cover; leaving it. 1) is round of 16 really lower case? 2) caption Argentina's Lionel Messi, center, celebrates after the World Cup round of 32 soccer match against Cape Verde in Miami Gardens, Fla., Friday, July 3, 2026. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)Reconciled style guide rules across capitalization, formatting, and caption standardsReconciled style guide rules across capitalization, formatting, and caption standards1) Yes - lowercase, per AJE's own usage. Your explainer copy ran "the final day of the round of 16" and "round-of-16 matches" lowercase, AJE's match-report slugs use "last 16", and the site's sports copy consistently treats it as descriptive ("round of 32 match", "last-16 thriller"), not a proper name. FIFA's own materials capitalise it (Round of 16), which is where the instinct comes from - but that is FIFA branding, not house style. So: lowercase in running copy; in the replacement headline it sits before the colon mid-phrase, so lowercase there too. The only time it takes a capital is opening a sentence. 2) The caption, wire-to-AJE: Argentina's Lionel Messi, centre, celebrates after the World Cup round of 32 match against Cabo Verde in Miami Gardens, Florida, on July 3, 2026 [File: Rebecca Blackwell/AP] What changed from the AP original: "center" → "centre" - the identification convention survives, Britishised "Cape Verde" → "Cabo Verde" - the guide's country list and AJE's own coverage (including the Fubo-era match reports) use Cabo Verde "soccer match" → "match" - AJE says football, but here the word is doing nothing; drop it rather than swap it "Fla." → "Florida" - no wire-style state abbreviations "Friday," dropped, "on" added before the date Credit rebuilt: parentheses to square brackets, order flipped to [Photographer/Agency], and crucially the File tag added - the photo is from the July 3 round-of-32 match illustrating a July 7 round-of-16 preview, exactly the not-contemporary case the File convention exists for. The date stays in the caption because it helps the reader place which match this was. Terminal full stop removed, "round of 32" lowercased alt text?Lionel Messi smiles with his arms raised in celebration on the pitch, surrounded by Argentina teammates in blue and white striped shirts](https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ap_6a4cb17550480-1783411061.jpg?resize=770%2C513&quality=80)
